Home
Creation vs Evolution
Evolution Myth

10 Scientific Facts Disproving Evolution

"Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to your care. Turn away from godless chatter and the opposing ideas of what is falsely called science." (1 Timothy 6:20)
The phrase ‘science falsely so called’ in 1 Timothy 6:20 would likely be refering to evolution.

"There shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, and saying, 'Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of... the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished." (2 Pet. 3:3-6)
To be "willingly ignorant" implies that a concept is known but that it is rejected and ignored without serious consideration. They know of the biblical flood, but they refuse to open-mindedly investigate the evidence for it. See my articles on global flood evidence here and here.
                  
  10 
Scientific Facts disproving Charles Darwin's
Theory of Evolution

1. The human body systems prove evolution wrong. There are 10 interdependent systems that exist. All of which cannot work unless the other 9 are already functioning. So which ones evolved first and why and in what order? And how would any of them function or even exist until the others evolved?

2. No one has ever observed evolution, there are no transitional fossils at all, see my article on the missing transitional fossils here. Evolution either has to be drawn, illustrated, or animated, which means evolution is only true in a virtual world, or someone's imagination.

3. In a global flood, the majority of aquatic life would not have to reach the surface of the water to get air. They would be expected to get buried in the same order level in the water in which they lived - which is exactly what we observe. It's funny how evolution supposedly evolved aquatic life in the exact same order the flood would have buried it...


4. Why do evolutionists have a population problem? Well, let us start in the beginning with one male and one female, and assume that they marry and have children and that their children marry and have children and so on. And let us assume that the population doubles every 150 years.  It should be noted that this growth rate is actually very conservative. In reality, even with disease, famines, and natural disasters, the world population currently doubles every 40 years or so. After 32 doublings, which is only 4,800 years, the world population would have reached almost 8.6 billion. That’s 2 billion more than the current population of 6.5 billion people!

This simple calculation shows that starting with Adam and Eve and assuming the conservative growth rate previously mentioned, the current population can be reached well within 6,000 years.

Evolutionists are always telling us that humans have been around for hundreds of thousands of years. If we did assume that humans have been around for 50,000 years and if we were to use the calculations above,  the world’s population would be a staggering figure—a one followed by 100 zeros; that is:

10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000.

They refuse to even discuss this subject. But the evidence is there and it raises many questions evolutionists do not want to address. All because this evidence destroys their worldview. 

5. The Coelacanth fish was touted to be a transitional form with half-formed legs and primitive lungs, ready to transition onto land.

This myth was exploded in December, 1938 when a live Coelacanth was caught in a fisherman’s net off the eastern coast of South Africa. It is now known that the natives of the Comoro Islands had been catching and eating the fish for years. It did not have half-formed legs or primitive lungs. It was simply a regular fish that people thought was extinct.

Evolutionists claimed the 350 million-year-old Coelacanth evolved into animals with legs, feet, and lungs. The Coelacanth is a star witness against the false theory of evolution. After 350 million years, the fish still doesn’t have a leg to stand on.

6. The universe is slowing down to a lower state, not higher. The genes of plants, insects, animals, and humans are continually becoming defective, not improving. Species are becoming extinct, not evolving. Order will always move naturally towards disorder or chaos. The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics, which has never been proven wrong.

7. The usual evolutionary picture has men existing as hunters and gatherers for 185,000 years during the Stone Age before discovering agriculture less than 10,000 years ago. Yet the archaeological evidence shows that Stone Age men were as intelligent as we are. It is very improbable that none of the eight billion people should discover that plants grow from seeds.


8. According to evolutionists, Stone Age Homo sapiens existed for 190,000 years before beginning to make written records about 4,000 to 5,000 years ago. Prehistoric man built megalithic monuments, made beautiful cave paintings, and kept records of lunar phases. Why would he wait two thousand centuries before using the same skills to record history?

9. Evolutionists say that Homo sapiens existed for at least 185,000 years before agriculture began, when the world population was roughly between one and ten million. All that time they were burying their dead, often with artifacts. By that scenario, they would have buried at least eight billion bodies. If the evolutionary time scale is correct, buried bones should be able to last for much longer than 200,000 years, so many of the supposed eight billion stone age skeletons should still be around (and certainly the buried artifacts). Yet only a few thousand have been found...


 10. Earth Age Inconsistency:
  • Back in 1770 they taught the earth was 70,000 years old.
  • In 1905 they said it's 2 billion years old.
  • By 1969, they went to the moon, they brought back moon rocks and said: “Oh, they're 3.5 billion years old.” That was the official age; 3.5 billion.
  • Today they say it's 4.6 billion years old.

The reason evolutionists cannot accept the truth, despite the obvious lack of evidence for evolution, can be explained by a famous quote from zoologist and evolutionist, D.M.S Watson: 

Evolution is a theory universally accepted not because it can be proved by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible. - D.M.S Watson

This, of course, is an admission that the foundation of evolution is not science, but a rejection of the supernatural. Evolution then is simply the best alternative anyone has been able to come up with. This also means that evolution is the only field in science where one decides on the answer first, and then looks for evidence to support that predetermined answer.

 See my article on, Top 20 Questions to Ask an Evolutionist, here.
See my article on, Where are the transitional fossils for evolution?, here.

References:
  • http://www.icr.org/article/evidence-for-young-world/
  • https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-against-evolution/billions-of-people-in-thousands-of-years/
  • http://www.yecheadquarters.org/
  • http://www.biblelife.org/evolution.htm

11 comments

  1. I don't understand why is it that Christians are mesmerized by evolution? Of course you know that denying evolution won't make your superstitions god any less imaginary, so what's the fascination?

    Evolution is irrelevant to atheists, if evolution were not true, it would have zero effect on the feasibility of various superstitions fabricated gods.

    The theory of evolution is backed by mountains of corroborating falsifiable evidence from dozens of disciplines documented using the scientific method and published in tens of thousands of peer reviewed papers by tens of thousands of scientists. It is one of the strongest theories in science.

    I don't discount a 'creation' theory; but such a theory doesn't exist, in fact a 'creation hypothesis' hasn't even been formulated using the scientific method.

    What apologists have presented over a very long period of time is a large number of vague, often false and contradictory claims, presented as propaganda, not sc…
    • I would be interested in reading your take on this topic. Maybe compile all the evidence into one post that refutes the points made in this one and others?
    • Your basic argument is that evolution is well known and therefore true- which is simply ridiculous. If you can't look at the facts and see that evolution is a false theory then you are choosing to believe lies.
  2. It is a known fact that Creationism is the foundation of Science and evidence only supports Intelligent Design
  3. There's so much evidence against evolution and yet the idiots still believe in it
  4. Both creation and evolution are metaphysical theories, not science and should be taught in religion classes instead. Although Darwinism is now shot so full of holes that the same kind of people who clung to an eternal geocentric universe fp now.
  5. When I look at Mount Rushmore, I see evidence of intelligent design, I do not believe that rocks were carved by erosion over billions of years. How much more when I see our universe.
  6. kent hovind a science teacher has a bunch of videos on youtube that use science to prove evolution false.
  7. it’s possible that no matter what we submit, and say it’s proof… we will still be wrong. We have a fictional imagination, and that equals whatever how many years we’ve been in existence. 100 years from now we will still be here with a different approach telling the same story.. without anything credible to show or say.
    We need to look towards outer space for our answers. The answer to this question isn’t in our back yard.
  8. Christians are not "mesmerized" with evolution itself, but we know that evolution contributes to what leads people away from God. What is so deceptive is that evolution is a belief, but it is presented as fact.
  9. Great article. It's only the very end I would put a little differently, or at least add to and explain. The sentence I refer to reads: "This also means that evolution is the only field in science where one decides on the answer first, and then looks for evidence to support that predetermined answer."
    That's true .... but only if understood that all "hard" sciences start with a hypothesis (a guess, not a hard answer, such as evolution) then looks for evidence to support OR deny the hypothesis (the main missing ingredient in evolutionary theory, especially when used as a fact, not a theory.). The truth is, this theory has been tossed out as it has been disproved for decades. The only two reasons it stays in conversation anywhere at all is 1) it is taught in public schools as though it were a fact and 2) those who embrace it do so in order to explain the amazing creation they live and move and have their being in, in a way that allows them to claim there is no…